Small Ball Poker Tips für Poker-Spieler
Die Vorteile der Pot-Kontrolle in Pokerturnieren - Die. Vielleicht haben Sie diesen Begriff schon mal vorher gehört: Small Ball Poker. Was aber genau ist Smallball Poker und welche Vorteile bringt. Zielsetzung beim Small Ball Poker. Man kann Small Ball auch treffend mit “Spiel kleiner Pots” umschreiben. Der Spieler versucht die Pots. Unter Small Ball Poker versteht man eine Spielweise, die großen Wert darauf legt nur um kleine Pots zu spielen. Dabei ist es unerheblich um welche. Manche Pros bevorzugen deshalb Pokerspiele mit kleinen Pots, auch Small Ball Poker genannt, um ihren Chip Stack ohne großes Risiko aufzubauen.
Zielsetzung beim Small Ball Poker. Man kann Small Ball auch treffend mit “Spiel kleiner Pots” umschreiben. Der Spieler versucht die Pots. Loose-aggressive oder Small Ball? Wer ein erfolgreicher Pokerspieler sein will, der muss neue Entwicklungen bei der Strategie aufmerksam im Auge halten. DELETED_ Hallo allerseits, hab vor kurzem das Buch von Negreanu gelesen und bin mal auf die Smallball Strategie aufmerksam. Loose-aggressive oder Small Ball? Wer ein erfolgreicher Pokerspieler sein will, der muss neue Entwicklungen bei der Strategie aufmerksam im Auge halten. Mit der Google Play Bücher App kannst du "Small Ball: Poker Holdem Strategy by Daniel Negreanu" auf deinem PC sowie deinen Android- und iOS-Geräten. DELETED_ Hallo allerseits, hab vor kurzem das Buch von Negreanu gelesen und bin mal auf die Smallball Strategie aufmerksam. Das Kernstück dieses Buch ist Negreanus wirkungsvolle und revolutionäre Smallball-Strategie. Sie werden lernen, wie Sie kleine Karten spielen, um große Pots.
And the more hands that your opponent thinks you could potentially be holding, the higher the chances are that they might pay you off.
Small-ball poker can be hugely effective in tournaments, and especially when you are on a table full of players who are not hugely aggressive.
The ideal type of opponent you want to be up against when playing small-ball poker is one who will just fire away once when bluffing post-flop. Against these players you can call in position and then bet small when they check to you on the turn — it will usually take the pot down.
Small-ball poker is much more difficult to implement when you are playing really aggressive opponents who will keep firing away, no matter what they hold.
In this case, it might be best to abandon small-ball for now and try to fight fire with fire. Join us on our Discord channel. We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website.
You can change your cookie settings at any time. You'll have to be ready take down medium and large pots with top pair-mid kicker type hands, regularly, to cover your losses and avoid being exploited by the inevitable increase in bluffs you are faced with.
From my experience, there are better ways to crush poker than using a small ball strategy in a cash game. Honestly, I think that small ball strategy is significantly more effective in cash games.
Many of the benefits it provides center around people adjusting to your image. In tournaments, that can all go down the drain when players are moved to different tables.
By contrast, in cash games you are much more likely to play a large number of hands against the same opponents. Further, in tournaments, you have to balance this strategy with the necessity of survival with a limited number of chips.
You need a deep stacked tournament for it to work well for any meaningful period of time, and even there, as blinds rise other factors will trump the gains from this strategy, forcing you to play differently to accommodate.
By contrast, in cash games, you can always have a deep stack, simply by adding chips to your stack if it starts to drift too low.
Finally, I would argue that winning lots of small pots is more meaningful in cash games than in tournaments. This is again because of the rising blinds in tournaments, which make the small pots you win early on relatively less important.
Unless you are truly expert, small ball is just an excuse to play loose and weak and likely to be a losing strategy.
What you should do instead is focus on the other players at the table and try to adjust to the way they are playing. See if you can figure out what kind of mistakes they tend to make and play in a way that has the best chance of exploiting those mistakes.
Sometimes that means playing small ball, but the difference is that when you do it, you do it for a reason. In raked cash games, small ball is terrible.
The rake significantly devalues small pots. Furthermore, the usual lack of antes make the pots small relative to your small ball raise. For these reasons and others that Toby already mentioned, I would argue against small ball in cash games.
Playing loose and weak in cash-games is the fast-track to loosing money and developing bad habits, because people arent scared to put their chips in to easily counter your weakness with aggression.
I think I have never seen a loose and weak winning player in a cash game. It's right that most of your winnings should come from small pots in position, but to do this you need aggression.
Small ball works for Daniel Negreanu because he is Daniel Negreanu. We have all seen his sick predictions of what someone has in their hole on TV.
So he gets that cred. In theory, if you can learn to play this style perfectly then you can probably have alot of luck against someone like Negreanu, who is great at reading people, because this style will help to through him off of your actual hand.
I would argue that the Negreanues are so rare that confusing them is not worth focusing on unless you play against them regularly. Further unless this style of play suits you that trying to adapt to the new style will be more costly than rewarding.
In the end the strategy that wins for you is a good strategy. I am of the opinion that learning new techniques and strategies only helps your game when it does not distract you from your strengths.
I think it helps more when your regular game has you figured out, and you need to change it up to keep from losing, or to recapture the gains you are no longer making.
If there was a single magic bullet then the entire final table of every tourney would be full of people using that.
Small ball poker is a "theoretically" incorrect version of poker. It appears to be an "adaptation" of the principles of the game based on the fact that the vast majority of players play too "loosely.
That's because you will "catch" more people with weak hands more often than you will be "caught. The other aspect of the game is that you can afford to play this way only when the stakes are relatively low for the level of the game in a "small ball" environment.
If they suddenly "escalate," you can no long play "loose," but ought to revert standard "tight game" strategy, and fold most hands.
Your second question suggests an assumption you might wish to reconsider. Asking how many players in a tourney are likely to be using "small ball" conflicts with some fundamental realities: Decent players mix up their tactics, often playing against their table image.
So, as always, the real answers depend on being able to recognize what others at the table are thinking and doing.
Not that you needed to hear that. The only practical and potentially useful advice I can offer is that you can and will find players in tourneys and at low stakes cash games who read a book and then rely too heavily on a single tactic - such as "small ball".
Once you learn to spot them, you can adjust your play to benefit from their predictability. I am currently introducing small ball to my micros cash game strategy.
Daniel teaches that you must only apply small ball from cut off or button position and when there is no-one else in the pot yet. Seems to me that there are four outcomes when I small ball.
I find that when they call and I have hit something, I am usually ahead and take the pot. This is sometimes a huge pot as my hand is disguised. They often play passively too as they have no idea what I am holding.
In my limited experience, they mostly fold straight away or fold to the c-bet. It is actually very uncommon to be behind either RR or having c-bet called with air The tricky situations arise when you hit a bit of the board but face aggression.
All in all I believe that this should just be an extra weapon to use together with all the other strategies which have their place depending on opponent, table dynamics, etc.
What works for Daniel is not going to work for everyone. He has excellent post flop play. He does not want to get in a coin flip as he feels he can beat you over the long run.
But most of us think we can beat our opponents over a long run. In a tournament a chip you lose is worth more than a chip you win.
You don't want to do a coin flip in a tournament where in a cash game not a problem. For sure in a tournament you don't want to get in a coin flip for your stack.
Small ball is not always small pots. If you have a big hand that is a likely winner or even have them dead then try to play a big pot.
Since you are not bluffing big it is hard to get paid off big. Since you can reload in cash game playing pure small ball is not optimal as it is designed to protect your chips.
A good player would abuse you and push you off too many pots. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Another key point to playing successful small ball poker is starting hand selection.
If you are going to enter a pot by raising with a less than a premium hand, then it is important that the hand you raise with has some kind of potential.
Although we are raising with less than premium hands, it does not necessarily mean that are trying to take down the blinds alone on every hand.
There is a high chance that we are going to get a caller because our raises are relatively small, and so we are going to need a hand that we can work with after the flop.
By playing hands with potential it gives us some room to make plays and possibly make very strong hands on or after the flop.
However, you should avoid getting too involved in hands when you hit middle or top pair. The chances are you will have a weak kicker, and as a general rule these types of pots should never become too big if you are going to win them.
Small ball poker is going to be most effective in situations where the blinds are small relative to the size of the stacks.
Small ball would be most suited to cash games and the early stages of tournaments. Toward the end of tournaments the blinds will usually be too great in relation to the size of the stacks to play small ball, as there will be little room post flop plays.
The last thing you want to be doing in a tournament is committing a quarter or more of your stack into a pot with a marginal hand before the flop.
Small ball would therefore be most effective at the start of tournaments. It would be fine to use in MTTs, but with SNGs there is a problem in that the structure is usually quite fast, and the period to play effective small ball will not last for long.
In addition, the image you create will become almost worthless near the end of the SNG tournament because the blinds will become so great that opponents will be forced into folding or calling regardless of what your image might have been at the start of the tournament.
Like the idea of getting coached by Daniel Negreanu? Check out his PokerVT training site. Raising small amounts from any position at the table with marginal hands in an attempt to recreate the "small ball" style of play is not going to be a successful strategy in my opinion.
In spite of this, there are actually a few genuinely effective elements to the small ball style though, such as:. I believe that amateur players who attempt to emulate small ball poker will get themselves in to tricky situations.
You definitely need a good post-flop game to be able to play small ball poker or should I just say LAG? As your game improves you may develop in to more of a loose-aggressive style of play, but that will not necessarily be "small ball poker".
I believe that Daniel Negreanu may be trying a little too hard to coin a super-awesome new playing style that will take over the world of poker, but at the end of the day it's just a weak variation on an existing one.
Americas Cardoom is the top worldwide poker room. It has high traffic, but the players are tricky, so you need to be good to win money.
I'll send you an email if something seriously interesting is taking place in online poker, or if I add something cool to the website.
Small Ball Poker - Was denken Sie?Gratis Poker. Natürlich gilt auch hier, dass es auf die richtige Dosis ankommt - wer zu häufig light 3-betting betreibt, der muss sich nicht wundern, wenn die Gegner beginnen, sich energisch zu wehren! So ist dies ein Balanceakt, und diese Spielweise hat eine hohe Varianz. Tightes Spiel.
Read this article from SplitSuit about capped ranges. This article covers the beginning stages of Long Ball. However, it is important to note that the rabbit hole extends deeply.
I will close out by saying that in Long Ball your focus is on maximizing value and not on losing the minimum. However, in such a complex game like ours there is a lot more grey than people care to acknowledge.
Finally, and as a disclaimer, if you choose to go down this road get ready to embrace some variance since you will be in the trenches fighting more often.
I find that when they are put in uncomfortable spots and are bluff-catching more than we are, we succeed.
Truth is no hand has value until showdown so we just gotta play the game according to that mantra. Great article. I like how you encourage embracing the grey area, for there is where me will find extra value!
Hi,Chris How can I learn more about longball style books,articles,videos and coaches? Thank you! Partially, I believe it is because the complexity of the strategy.
It has a lot of moving parts. On average, it takes my best students a couple months to begin to put the strategy pieces together.
But once that occurs, they become a huge problem for their opponents. Question 1: Is this pre-flop? Answer 1: This was concerning postflop play.
So for example, QQ bets flop get raised… almost entirely QQ is choosing to just call down and go into bluff catch mode.
The correct adjustment against someone like me is to 3bet Flop. Answer 2: We like the 2s. Answer 3: The Ace is kind of a magic card.
He could have these hands as well, but we may choose to bet this card because it places pressure on some portions of his range, where as the 2s places no pressure on anything.
How about a video or power point in the monthly RCP collection? Enough to help us move into this a bit deeper. I found it fascinating and would like to include it in my game.
I gather this works best when IN position. I was gonna make some snide, asinine, joking remark, but then I saw that you replied to damn near every comment, and you won me over!
Great article, excellent read, and good advice. I am hesitant to try this play style because I am not a huge fan of variance and avoid it as best I can.
Still, I will likely give it shot at one of the frequent free roll events I play weekly. Jokes are always welcome. Which type of players you prefer this strategy with?
Does position factor into your decisions? Stack sizes? What if you opponent has kj crushing you and simply calls.. This makes sense if you know your opponent bets out often with draws,or air often making you think your top pair against his perceived range is good so re-raising to is a good thing.
I would like to agree in the idea of using this strategy against similar players to you if everyone is a grinder playing correct then being a maniac might simply be the best strategy based on their range and play types,but often enough they will catch on and trap you by flat calling with aces or huge draws with huge bluff value and good odds to catch.
Another reason this is a bad strategy is when your opponent raises to say after you raised it to from 55 or whatever.
Your stuck you have trash your possibly out of position. What do you do shove it with a good read,no your dead meat and wasted money bad play.
You have no idea what your opponent has he could haves aces,ak or air and is just firing back at you. Learn more about Christian here. Christian Soto August 25, Thank You Bocky!
Ryan September 29, Christian Soto October 1, Thank you Ryan! The value is made in the grey area trenches!
Glad I could inspire a little! Bruno March 7, Christian Soto March 7, Eileen Sutton September 13, And especially as the qualification for a monster hand nears toward the nuts, things can get even rarer.
Simple strategies are suboptimal. The highest winrates in poker will never be earned with the simplest strategies. This is not to say that small ball cannot make a profit — it most certainly can.
But to earn the highest winrates at any game you need to be able to think deeply and take creative lines that edge toward optimization.
Playing too many preflop hands. Preflop aggression is lacking. Small ball players rarely act as the preflop aggressor, which means they are limping or calling way more often than raising or 3betting.
Missed postflop opportunities. While there is simplicity in this, and a satiation for the risk-averse, it simply misses too many profitable opportunities.
Only fish get outsmarted. Which means against most players the small baller has limited upside potential the rare times they do catch a huge hand. Beating small ballers is the easiest thing in the world.
If they check, continue firing. If they cbet, heavily consider floating and taking the pot away when they check the next street.
Using small ball approaches for the duration of a tournament or SNG may result in more min-cashes, but it fails to set up big wins. The monster hands come along too rarely to offset the increasing blinds and antes.
And while a small baller may be able to hold on to a 10bbbb stack longer than some other players, they will eventually dwindle down to dust and be forced to gamble with their short stack like everyone else.
Small ball is better than having zero strategy at all, which is why it performs better than calling station fish or maniac fish.
But in the long run, any strategy that is reliant on hitting monster hands is going to be suboptimal. Two simple areas to do this that would quickly upgrade a small baller out of small ball status, would be by adding some extra bluffs into their game.
Even cheap bluffs like a one-time 3bet or a bluff cbet on the flop can tip the scales. And adding more sophisticated bluffs like double barrels and bluff check-raises can do wonders for your winrate.
Start with my Bluffing Poker Guide. Another area that would help immensely is getting thinner on your value betting requirements. Sure, sometimes they may induce a bluff and make a little profit — but in games where players are more comfortable calling than bluffing themselves, this misses so much value.
You may already notice how these changes would impact your overall strategy. Admittedly, these changes will increase your exposure and have you risking some extra chips with hands other than the nuts.
The goal is to make decisions based upon the right factors and to capitalize on profitable spots when they arise. And I assure you, they arise way more often than any small baller would admit.
For most players who gravitated to small ball for its simplicity and due to their own risk-averse nature, it may not seem easy to upgrade from a small baller to solid TAG or LAG.
But actually pulling those triggers is a scarier proposition. For me personally, the only way that I can overcome monetary fear is with information and study.
And look, the work needed to get away from small ball and into a higher EV strategy is no joke, but anything worthwhile requires hard work.
The truth is that if you put in the work to build your hand reading skills, and pair those with simple poker math , it makes pulling triggers way easier.
And if you have any risk-averse tendencies, an uneasy feeling leads you to avoid the risk.